One should remember that for Blunt’s generation of homosexual
men, friends in innumerable ways provided a support network in a hostile world
and defended the individual against the State.
--Miranda Carter, Anthony Blunt, his lives (Farrar, Straus,
and Giroux 2001).
I was in graduate school in art history in 1979 when it was
revealed that Anthony Blunt was the fourth spy in the Cambridge group of spies
that included Philby, Burgess and MacClean.
How could this be, this expert on one of my favorite painters, Nicolas
Poussin? Miranda Carter does an excellent
job in her attempt to answer a basically unanswerable question, detailing Blunt’s
life and work within the British class system, against which he felt he was
rebelling as he passed secrets to the Soviet Union when he worked for military
intelligence during and after WW II.
Later, when I worked at "The Nation" I heard James Weinstein, editor of "In
These Times", say that he thought the Rosenbergs were guilty and if he had had
the chance he, too, would have passed on secrets in the cause of peace.
The importance of Blunt’s
homosexuality in his actions became
clear when I recently watched Basil Dearden’s film Victim, from 1961. This was a shocking film in its time, with
the first use of “homosexual” in an English-language film, and portrays a
scheme to blackmail homosexuals, who would rather pay than be exposed and
possibly go to prison. “I can’t help the
way I am; nature’s played me a dirty trick,” says one blackmail victim. Homosexuality was a crime in England until
1967, though of course it was very selectively enforced, mostly against the
lower classes and not against actors, such as Dirk Bogarde, who starred in
Victim. Bogarde plays a barrister who
had suppressed his own homosexuality for the sake of a wife and a career, the
film emphasizing the sexual complexity of us all. The film is crisply photographed in
black-and-white (by Otto Heller) and shot on London locations that emphasize
the diversity of the city. In England
laws against homosexuality were eliminated in 1967, though they still exist in some
states in the U.S., essentially no longer enforced since the Supreme
Court in 2003 struck down a Texas law against sodomy.
Frederick Wiseman’s recent documentary In Jackson Heights
emphasizes diversity. The different
ethnic groups in this Queens neighborhood tend to stay separate when it comes
to food, entertainment and religious worship but do come together to solve
problems with landlords, police and traffic safety. There are a fair number of support groups for
the LGBT community and Wiseman shows their meetings as well as those of businessmen struggling to
keep their businesses going in the face of encroaching gentrification. Wiseman does not impose narration on his
documentaries and does not even identify individuals. This is not without its own problems but does
keep a viewer involved and paying attention to the details of the people and
groups of immigrants who are providing a vivid presence through their hard work
and involvement in the community.
No comments:
Post a Comment