For a quarter of a century pretty much everything coming out
of our domestic film industry has aspired to the condition of the animated cartoon
(as Walter Pater said the other arts did to the condition of music).
--James Bowman, "The New Criterion," Dec. 2016
--James Bowman, "The New Criterion," Dec. 2016
Today Flaherty seems touchingly romantic in his desire to
find people who have escaped the corruption of civilization.
--Andrew Sarris, The American Cinema
--Andrew Sarris, The American Cinema
I don’t get out to too many movies these days (for many reasons, which I will go into at another time) but our
five-year-old daughter’s school recently had a showing at our local Brooklyn
theatre, the Alpine: ten bucks for the
movie, including soda and popcorn. So Susan and I took our daughter to her first movie (our older son came also). The theatre was comfortable, the sound and
projection good; only the movie itself –Disney’s Moana—was lousy, transferring
a Disney princess to the South Seas, typical bubblegum songs included. The movie was more assembled than created -- the
use of four directors indicates that – and was totally confusing: I understood nothing about what was going on,
though my daughter was occasionally scared.
I admit that I have never been a big fan of animation, though the
current computer-animated cartoons are even more claustrophobic than the
hand-drawn ones were. And why do the
voices get such big billing –the god Maui was voiced by Dwayne Johnson, from
many action movies – when knowing the voice only interferes with appreciating,
to the extent one can, the character?
Returning to Robert Flaherty’s Moana of 1926 (available from
Netflix) only indicates how far we have gone with film –in the wrong direction –
in 90 years. Flaherty spent two years on
Samoa filming the natives doing everything from fishing to tattooing (a rite of
manhood) to climbing tall trees to obtain coconuts and making clothes out of
mulberry bark. In the 70’s Flaherty’s
daughter Monica returned to Samoa and recorded some songs and sound that was added to the
original silent film. Flaherty’s films
are not what could at all accurately be called “documentaries” because much of
what he filmed in Moana was a re-creation of the past, as was also true of his other
films, including Nanook of the North (1922).
In Moana (a male name in Flaherty's Samoa, not a female one as in the Disney film) he
captures beautifully not only “the wind in the trees” (to quote D. W.
Griffith), but the movement of the sea and the indigenous people
and their dances.
No comments:
Post a Comment